I am surprised that I am seeing very little conversation in OWC or anywhere about the National Defense Authorization Act that congress just passed and Obama seems prepared to sign into law.  It apparently gives the government, including the military, simply on the basis of suspicion the authority (and may, in fact require them) to take into custody anyone they believe may be associate,d with Al Quaeda, the Taliban or "associated groups and hold them indefinitely.  It also gives them the power to turn these people over to foreign governments (rendition). Based on our experience with the attorney general's list in the 60's, this could easily be stretched to include most people associated with OWC.

There seems to be little discussion of this anywhere including within the OWC community.  Why is this horrendous act of Congress getting so little comment?  What do other people on this list think about this?


Views: 17

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Here is a link to a Mother Jones article on this subject:


I agree, Kenoli.  The lack of response across the board is a bit mysterious.  It's been so effectively blacked out by corporate media that people I assume would know about the NDAA clauses, have no clue.  I'm also surprised MoveOn hasn't ignited it's usual storm of coverage and action.  I see a fairly strategic and tactical timing on the part of pro-NDAA sources to first clearing encampments; waiting a couple of beats for #Occupy momentum and attention to flag; creating some media diversion with "withdrawal" from Iraq and giving people their tax break, etc., etc.; while propping up Obama as some kind of hero for the people while he is much more Wall St.'s hero. 

I think there's still a little bit of shock and confusion re: the source of the indefinite detention language.  Up til a week and a half a go, we actually believed that Obama was prepared to veto the NDAA, that is until Levin dropped the bomb saying the indefinite detention clauses came from the White House and therefore making the likelihood of an Obama veto slim to none.  I think a lot of people who have been thinking Obama is pro we, the people, are a bit disoriented.

Having recognized what is actually happening through untinted glasses, the challenge seems, as always, to assess the most effective actions from here to dissuade Obama from signing the indefinite detention version of the NDAA. Would mass protest be enough? Can we pull it off in such a short time frame?


Weekly Cafe Calls

Regular Calls are no longer being held.  Below is the schedule that was maintained from the Fall of 2011 through Jan 10, 2013.

"Vital Conversations" 

8-10a PDT | 11a-1p EDT | 3-5p GMT 

Tuesdays (except 10/16)
"Connect 2012"

1-3p PDT | 4-6p EDT | 8-10p GMT

"Occupy Heart" 

3-5p PDT | 6-8p EDT | 10p-12a GMT

Latest Activity

Profile IconAdrien Burke and Burl Hall joined Occupy Cafe
Sep 19
Burl Hall posted a blog post

Tamera for Tomorrow: A Model for the 99% and Creating Just and Environmentally Sustainable Communities

Lets speak to the deep meaning of the vampire myth in relationship to modern day.  How many people, especially many of us rationalized liberals, realize that myth speaks to reality.   Our issue in not understanding is our lack of an intelligent understanding of metaphor, which epistemologist Gregory Baetson defines as “a language…See More
Sep 18
Ben Roberts commented on Ben Roberts's event Occupy Decentrale
"Getting started shortly with the next Gift Circle"
Sep 18
Deborah Hart Yemm commented on Ben Roberts's event Occupy Decentrale
"Oh, reading your earlier comment, Ben - maybe your 11:30 am is the "gift circle" whatever that is or the " additional hour prior to".  Does that mean that the call/online space opens ahead of time ? "
Sep 17


  • Add Photos
  • View All

© 2015   Created by Occupy Cafe Stewards.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service